An Integrated Fuzzy MCDM and Trend Analysis Approach for Financial Performance Evaluation of Energy Companies in Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/jscda1120233Keywords:
Hesitant Fuzzy Sets, TOPSIS, MCDM, Financial Performance, Trend AnalysisAbstract
Financial performance evaluation is a great importance for companies. The aim of this study is to analyze the financial performances of energy companies traded in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index in Turkey comparatively using trend analysis and multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). For this purpose, the changing values of accounting-based performance indicators over the years have been compiled from financial reports. The data were first evaluated by it was analyzed by Hesitant Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (HFTOPSIS). Then, it was analyzed by trend analysis for each variable separately. Comparative results show that MCDM rankings based on fuzzy set theory are different from analyzes performed alone. In addition, there is no study in the literature examining the financial performance of energy companies in Turkey based on the sustainability index.
Downloads
References
Akbalık, M., & Kavcıoğlu, Ş. (2013). Energy Sector Outlook in Turkey. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, EYİ Özel Sayısı, 97-118.
KPMG, Sektörel Bakış-Enerji. (2019). https://home.kpmg/tr/tr/home/gorusler/2019/07/sektorel-bakis2019.html
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & ve Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
Lu, W., Chau, K. W. Wang, H., & ve Pan, W. (2014). A decade's debate on the nexus between corporate social and corporate financial performance: a critical review of empirical studies 2002-2011. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.072
Düzer, M., & ve Önce, S. (2017). Kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik raporlaması ve finansal performans: bist'te işlem gören şirketler için karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 637-648. https://doi.org/10.33905/bseusbed.348073
Danesh, D., Ryan, M. J., & Abbasi, A. (2017). A systematic comparison of multi-criteria decision making methods for the improvement of project portfolio management in complex organisations, International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 16(3), 280-320. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2017.085638
Jha, M. K., & Rangarajan, K. (2020). Analysis of corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance causal linkage in the Indian context. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 5(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-020-00038-z
Yalcin, N., Bayrakdaroglu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2012). Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries. Expert systems with applications, 39(1), 350-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.024
Wang, Y. J. (2014). The evaluation of financial performance for Taiwan container shipping companies by fuzzy TOPSIS. Applied Soft Computing, 22, 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.021
Visalakshmi, S., Lakshmi, P., Shama, M. S., & Vijayakumar, K. (2015). An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-TOPSIS approach for financial performance evaluation of GREENEX industries. International Journal of Operational Research, 23(3), 340-362. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOR.2015.069626
Islamoglu, M., Apan, M., & Oztel, A. (2015). An evaluation of the financial performance of REITs in Borsa Istanbul: A case study using the entropy-based TOPSIS method. International Journal of Financial Research, 6(2), 124-138. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v6n2p124
Shaverdi, M., Ramezani, I., Tahmasebi, R., & Rostamy, A. A. A. (2016). Combining fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS with financial ratios to design a novel performance evaluation model. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 18, 248-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0142-8
Eyüboglu, K., & Çelik, P. (2016). Financial performance evaluation of Turkish energy companies with fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Business and economics research Journal, 7(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2016321806
Yadav, S. K., & Kapoor, R. (2018). Financial performance ranking of automotive companies in India using TOPSIS method. International Journal of Business Excellence, 16(2), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2018.094702
Aytekin, A. (2019). Evaluation of the financial performance of tourism companies traded in BIST via a hybrid MCDM model. International Journal of Applied Research in Management and Economics, 2(4), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.33422/ijarme.v2i4.274
Hoe, L. W., Siew, L. W., Fai, L. K., Xin, A. L. J., & Fun, L. P. (2020). An empirical evaluation on the performance of food service industry in Malaysia with TOPSIS model. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1706(1), 012172. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1706/1/012172
Ova, A. (2021). Analyzing Financial Performance of Turkish Deposit Banks Using TOPSIS Method. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 45, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.796587
Baydaş, M., & Elma, O. E. (2021). An objectıve criteria proposal for the comparison of MCDM and weighting methods in financial performance measurement: An application in Borsa Istanbul. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(2), 257-279. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame210402257b
Gupta, S., Mathew, M., Gupta, S., & Dawar, V. (2021). Benchmarking the private sector banks in India using MCDM approach. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(2), e2409. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2409
Roy, P., & Patro, B. (2021). Financial performance analysis of NBFC-MFIs in India using TOPSIS and IV-TOPSIS. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 6(5), 1423. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2021.6.5.086
Nguyen, P. H., Tsai, J. F., Hu, Y. C., & Ajay Kumar, G. V. (2022). A Hybrid method of MCDM for evaluating financial performance of vietnamese commercial banks under COVID-19 impacts. Shifting Economic, Financial and Banking Paradigm: New Systems to Encounter COVID-19, 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79610-5_2
Liew, K. F., Lam, W. S., & Lam, W. H. (2022). Financial Network Analysis on the Performance of Companies Using Integrated Entropy-DEMATEL-TOPSIS Model. Entropy, 24(8), 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24081056
Lam, W. H., Lam, W. S., Liew, K. F., & Lee, P. F. (2023). Decision Analysis on the Financial Performance of Companies Using Integrated Entropy-Fuzzy TOPSIS Model. Mathematics, 11(2), 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020397
Makki, A. A., & Alqahtani, A. Y. (2023). Capturing the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak on the financial performance disparities in the energy sector: A Hybrid MCDM-Based evaluation approach. Economies, 11(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11020061
Patyal, V. S., Kumar, R., Lamba, K., & Maheshwari, S. (2023). Performance evaluation of Indian electricity distribution companies: An integrated DEA-IRP-TOPSIS approach. Energy Economics, 106796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106796
Acar, M. (2003). Tarımsal işletmelerde finansal performans analizi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (20).
Özgülbaş, N. (2006). Türkiye'de kamu hastanelerinin finansal durum değerlendirmede kullanılabilecekleri bir yöntem: trend analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (29), 129-139.
Özari, Ç., & Erol, E. D. (2019). Trend Analizi ve Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemleriyle Finansal Performans Analizi. R&S-Research Studies Anatolia Journal, 2(5), 230-246. https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.521748
Koçyiğit, S. Ç., Biyik, E., & Ertaş, Ş. (2022). Özel bir sağlık işletmesinin finansal performansının trend analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(1), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1015793
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Torra, V. (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International journal of intelligent systems, 25(6), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20418
Xia, M., & Xu, Z. (2011). Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. International journal of approximate reasoning, 52(3), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2010.09.002
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey, 58-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
Xu, Z., & Xia, M. (2011). Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Information sciences, 181(11), 2128-2138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.01.028
Zhang, X., & Xu, Z. (2014). Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. International journal of intelligent systems, 29(12), 1061-1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21676
Zhang, X., & Xu, Z. (2017). Hesitant fuzzy methods for multiple criteria decision analysis. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42001-1
Karagül, A. A., Çabuk, A., Erol, C., Bahar, B., Sevim, Ş., & Sayılır, Ö. (2013). Finansal Tablolar Analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, Eskişehir.
Akgüç, Ö. (2011). Mali Tablolar Analizi (14. b.). İstanbul: Avcıol Basım Yayın.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
